![]() ![]() There were no clinically important or statistically significant average causal effects of intervention on the incidence or severity of complications. At 2 years, 15 (7.4%) participants in the Intervention group and 16 (7.8%) participants in the Control group had died (hazard ratio from unadjusted Cox model = 0.93 p from log rank test 0.85). Resultsīetween July 2015 and March 2018, 410 participants were randomised (204 to Intervention, 206 to Control). Survival status and date of death were determined by blinded assessors 2 years after randomisation. All participants received usual post-discharge care. Participants in the Intervention group received 36 phone calls and three home visits over the first 2 years following discharge. People who had sustained a spinal cord injury in the preceding 2 years, were wheelchair-dependent, and were about to be discharged from hospital in Bangladesh were recruited and randomised to an Intervention or Control group using a concealed allocation procedure stratified by level of lesion (tetraplegia/paraplegia). ![]() SettingĪ pragmatic randomised controlled trial was undertaken. To determine the effectiveness of a sustainable community-based intervention designed to prevent serious complications and death 2 years after discharge in people with spinal cord injury in Bangladesh. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |